In any case, the quantity of anti-Covenant material can be overwhelming, making it hard, at times, to see the forest for the trees. The No Anglican Covenant Coalition has attempted to focus attention on particularly strong arguments against adopting the Covenant by issuing a one-page handout titled “Ten Reasons Why the Proposed Anglican Covenant Is a Bad Idea.”
As a Coalition member, I contributed to the new list, though I didn’t promote what is perhaps my most important reason for opposing the Covenant, namely those who have championed it. (If Bob Duncan is for it, how could it possibly be a good thing?)
Here are some of my favorites—abbreviated here—from the new list, selected as much for their phrasing as for their content:
- The centralization of authority envisioned by the proposed Covenant is cumbersome, costly, and undemocratic. (Reason 3)
- The proposed Covenant is dangerously vague. (Reason 5)
- The proposed "Covenant" seems more like a treaty, contract, or instrument of surrender than it does a covenant. (Reason 9)
Get your No Anglican Covenant merchandise at the Farrago Gift Shop.
To date, the pro-Covenant case has been nothing but namecalling and emotional blackmail.ReplyDelete