Last month, I wrote a brief post about the meaning of “DEI,” and I asked how anyone could be against it. Below, I intend to offer something of an answer to that question. I don’t actually know why Donald Trump holds the detestable views that he does, but I can at least suggest what those views are.
When I first heard Donald Trump rail against DEI, I assumed he was opposing offices, whether in the government or the private sector, intended to promote a more diverse and fair workplace.
One can quibble about the utility of such offices. There surely is a danger that diversity, equality, and inclusion lead to fixed quotas for minority hires. One can make a case even for quotas, but it is clear that Americans are generally opposed to them.
My conception of DEI has little to do with Trump’s view of it. Trump apparently considers the very idea of diversity, of equality, and of inclusion as anathema. He tasked federal workers with removing even those words from government documents and Web sites. Trump wanted every program aimed in any way at promoting diversity, equality, or inclusion to be dismantled. Programs were indeed killed—or are in the process of being killed—and information involving race or extraordinary women or minority men have disappeared from public view.
To Trump, there is only one race of consequence, and it is White. People of other races cannot be real Americans and certainly deserve no special consideration, irrespective of their past treatment at the hands of the government.
Generously, Trump acknowledges that women exist—one of only two government-recognized sexes now—but they should not be serving in roles traditionally held by men. (Exceptions are made for women in the Trump cabinet.) Transgender, intersex, and gay people are beneath Trump’s notice. The undocumented of whatever race or sex are merely trash to be disposed of. Their children born in this country are freeloaders who should follow their parents wherever they came from.
Who is an American to this president? The real Americans are citizens who are married White, heterosexual, able-bodied Christian, Republican men doing manly jobs. American women of consequence have similar characteristics but are homemakers and mothers.
Why do we have a president who holds substantial numbers of citizens in contempt?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Anonymous comments are not allowed. All comments are moderated by the author. Gratuitous profanity, libelous statements, and commercial messages will be not be posted.